The RPC Team
The Research-to-Policy Collaboration relies on the coordinating power of a handful of staff who are supported by a range of voluntary researchers at various career stages. Working most closely on responding to opportunities to distill research related to current policy priorities are the RPC Directors, Policy Coordinator, fellows, and interns. Read below to learn more about our exceptional team.
Max Crowley, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Human Development, Family Studies, and Public Policy, and directs the Prevention Economics Planning and Research Program. He is an expert in economic evaluation and the financing of early childhood programs and is a member of the National Academy of Medicine's Committee on the Use of Economic Estimates to Invest in Children, Youth and Families. This work sits at the intersection of human development, economics and public policy. Max leads multiple efforts to increase the use of evidence in the early childhood and health space in a thoughtful manner that will protect children and the public while mobilizing new resources to support evidence-based programming. Max is a frequent consultant and invited speaker on the economics of prevention for initiatives around the country. This includes ongoing consultation to many Federal and State agencies. Additionally, Max's work involves utilizing advanced analytic designs, administrative data and technological solutions to optimize preventive strategies.
Dr. Taylor Scott is the Co-Director of the Research-to-Policy Collaboration, one of the various research translation strategies that she oversees as the Director of Research Translation in the Evidence-to-Impact Collaborative. In 2015, she and Dr. Max Crowley launched the Research-to-Policy Collaboration via a pilot supported by the National Prevention Science Coalition. Since then, she has helped to develop it as a replicable, theory-based model as well as demonstrate its effectiveness with rigorous study. She also directs the RPC fellowship training program and oversees scholarly research activities that shed light on the best practices for research translation, science communication, and facilitating productive interactions between researchers and policymakers. In this capacity, she has consulted on myriad activities that bridge research and policy, supported congressional briefings and policy papers, and authored numerous peer-reviewed papers.
Brittany Gay earned her Ph.D. in Applied Developmental Psychology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). Her research, which intersects developmental and community psychology, centers on the contextual factors that contribute to the well-being of children and their families. Aligned with her interests in evaluation, poverty, and education, Brittany has worked with organization and programmatic decision makers on issues such as juvenile workforce training, food insecurity, and early literacy engagement, consulting on feasible program goals and evaluation capacity development. She currently supports the implementation of the RPC through outreach to congressional staff and researchers and brokering collaborations between them. She also provides technical assistance for process evaluation.
Jessica Pugel earned her M.A. in Psychology from San Diego State University. Throughout undergraduate and graduate training, she studied how structural factors of our immediate communities affect individuals, groups, and intergroup relations. These findings repeatedly pointed to the need to change the system to effectively improve relations, which contributed to her interest in policy. Her undergraduate honors thesis and graduate thesis both emphasized the importance of intergroup contact (political parties and ethnic groups, respectively). She was able to study yet another type of intergroup contact when she joined the RPC as an intern in January 2020: contact between researchers and policymakers. Now as a research associate, Jessica's role includes (1) supporting analytic capacity, (2) enhancing researcher engagement, and (3) maintaining partnerships with related organizations.
Antoine Lovell is a doctoral candidate at Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service. His dissertation explores the perception of the future for emerging adults in The New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). Specifically, his study sought out to understand the connection, if any, between multiple generations of family members in public housing and future orientation. Antoine is an intervention researcher and has a keen interest in understanding how social policy impact vulnerable populations. Antoine's professional experience includes work with legislatures, advocacy on behalf of homeless populations, workforce development, preservation of affordable housing, and program evaluation. Antoine's primary research interests include policy implementation, youth development, homelessness, housing, race and racism, poverty, along with social/public policy and their impact on people of African descent.
Four years ago, Mallory and her research team sent a policy recommendation report to several Colombian policymakers who used their research to design a commission on truth and reconciliation following the national conflict. As she saw firsthand how research could be used to improve policymaking and societal well-being, she was shocked to later find out that researchers and policymakers often do not collaborate to make evidence-based, effective policy. Mallory graduated from Brigham Young University with a Bachelor's in Political Science and Government. She has worked as a researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations, a research and policy advisor for a Utah state legislature campaign, a policy director of a Utah nonprofit and lobbying group, and a policy fellow at an international peacebuilding nonprofit. She has conducted interview-based research with nearly thirty researchers, practitioners, and policymakers from think tanks, universities, nonprofits, and USAID about bridging the research-policy gap.
Fellowship and Internship Program
Many research training programs do not offer much training with regard to how researchers can engage and support the policymaking process. Moreover, there is substantial demand among junior scholars for hands-on experiences outside of academic settings. Our fellowship and internship program offers applied training experiences for junior scholars who desire experience with research translation and/or policy research. Applications are taken on a rotating basis.
Selected Interns become involved in at least one project that contributes to their professional development goals. Fellows contribute to the broadest array of activities, and earn this status after contributing 150 hours or more (i.e., approximately one full-time practicum or internship).
Not only does this opportunity provide a valuable training experience, the talented fellows and interns who work with us have expanded our capacity to:
Respond to policymakers' requests for research evidence and identify experts in the field
Engage research experts from across the country in federal policy efforts
Support events and congressional meetings at the Capitol
Investigate how research evidence can be leveraged in legislation
Evaluate our efforts to disseminate research to policymakers
Present or publish, including peer-reviewed research papers as well as policy and practice briefs
Director of Research and Evaluation
Elizabeth (Beth) Long earned her Ph.D. in Clinical and Translational Science from Virginia Commonwealth University. Her current research interests include investigating ways to improve the use of research in policymaking to improve lives and prevent problem behaviors, especially substance use disorders (SUDs). These interests grew out of her undergraduate and graduate research examining social, neuropsychological, and genetic risk factors related to SUDs, where she came to recognize the significant influence of environmental risk factors for SUDs and related problems, leading to her interest in informing large-scale impact through policy. She joined the RPC in 2018 to lead the quantitative evaluation of the RPC’s impact. More specifically, this work involves (1) survey development and programming; (2) data collection; and (3) data management and analysis. In addition to the quantitative evaluation of the RPC, Beth pioneered the evaluation methodology for examining strategies to optimize electronic research dissemination approaches to improve the reach of research syntheses among policymakers.